RFAYX vs. ^GSPC

In the year-to-date period, RFAYX achieves a 2.57% return, which is significantly higher than ^GSPC's 0.51% return. Over the past 10 years, RFAYX has underperformed ^GSPC with an annualized return of 1.59%, while ^GSPC has yielded a comparatively higher 10.85% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Russell Investments Investment Grade Bond Fund (RFAYX) and S&P 500 (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current RFAYX Sharpe Ratio is 1.13, which is higher than the ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio of 0.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RFAYX and ^GSPC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

The maximum RFAYX drawdown since its inception was -19.35%, smaller than the maximum ^GSPC drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RFAYX and ^GSPC.

The current volatility for Russell Investments Investment Grade Bond Fund (RFAYX) is 1.44%, while S&P 500 (^GSPC) has a volatility of 4.77%. This indicates that RFAYX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.